
“We have too many perfectly matched advocates.”
– Said No One
Building a steady pipeline of customer advocates is like searching for four-leaf clovers in a field of green. It takes intention, patience, and a sharp eye—not luck. Yet too many customer advocacy managers treat it like a side project, sidelined by urgent one-off requests. Without a system for continuously identifying and onboarding the right advocates, you’re stuck in reactive mode—constantly hunting and fulfilling at the same time, often under pressure from stakeholders who needed that advocate yesterday. And you don’t want to be under the microscope of executives who get wind of an urgent advocate need that’s taking too long.
So…how do you break the reactive cycle?
Let’s dig into the core issues most programs face, and explore practical options (with pros and cons) to tackle them.
Let’s start with the most crucial question: What types of advocates are needed? We think of type as:
Think about current and future needs. Current needs often come from analyzing your sales pipeline. Future needs? Those should align with your company’s growth priorities. You might be surprised how easily your company’s strategic goals can (and should) shape your advocacy goals.
Spoiler alert: it’s not a random percentage of your customer base. Goals like “let’s get 10% of our customers in the program” are pure vanity. The volume may just be unwarranted. And what if an inordinate amount of time and energy is spent recruiting advocates and most are irrelevant to current needs? What a waste of precious time; yours, your stakeholders and your customers! When a customer joins your program, they’re making an emotional commitment to your brand. They expect to be called on not just added to a database.
Having 1,000 advocates when only 400 are needed? That’s not scale—it’s inefficiency. Worse, it’s a disservice to the advocates who want to be involved but aren’t activated.
Let’s look at how to estimate need by stakeholder group:
Now that you have your priority advocate criteria and estimated quantities, it’s time to consider your available recruiting channels. Which ones you use will depend on organizational, political, and even intangible considerations. Let’s explore your recruitment options—from classic to creative.
PROS
Salespeople can have skills of persuasion, and those skills can be applied to recruiting customers to be advocates. They are relationship oriented, and that’s always at the heart of acting as an advocate. An advocate’s willingness to “help” a vendor stems from a sense of being well-served and realizing business benefits. Salespeople are receptive to rewards/incentives, if well-designed.
CONS
Salespeople are all different. Some will see how helping you will ultimately benefit them (and the company), while others see a request to identify their happy customers as a bother and in competition with their quota pressures. They may not be sufficiently responsive or motivated, ruling them out as a useful source. If spiffs are used they must be compelling (tip: ask them what would motivate them).
PROS
Knowledgeable about their clients’ health and relationship-focused. More likely than sales to appreciate (and rarely receive) incentives.
CONS
Customer success managers are busy people. Managing relationships is time-consuming and problem-solving, planning and collaboration is primarily in an effort to achieve renewals. Oddly, we find that most CSMs are not incentivized or otherwise evaluated on the advocacy of their customers. The unfortunate fact is that unless advocacy is a performance metric, they view your goals as distractions and interruptions to their goals (“We don’t have time for that!”). We’re biased, but that just seems counterintuitive.
Satisfaction Surveys
Most companies have a way to gauge customer satisfaction whether via Net Promoter or a more traditional CSAT survey. The results include customers who self-identify as happy customers (“Promoters” in Net Promoter terminology). The segment of most satisfied customers is your recruiting lead list. Reach out to them on an individual basis for that personal touch, or use your campaign automation tool (Marketo, Pardot, Eloqua) to recruit en masse.
User Conferences
If you have an annual user conference be sure that your program has a presence there. That could be a table/booth or a few minutes of presentation time on the main stage. Not only are these options a great recruiting opportunities; they are also relationship-building opportunities. Established programs build customer video capture into their plan and reserve a hospitality/conference room and schedule current advocates for short-form video recording. It’s a super efficient use of a video crew.
PROS
Reaching out directly is more expedient—plain and simple. Be sure to keep your peers—who own the customer relationships—informed of your activities so there are no surprises. Equally important, don’t delegate this outreach to an inexperienced (e.g., intern) or ill-suited team member. These are your most valuable customer relationships and they should be treated accordingly.
CONS
You don’t have direct working relationships at first, so customers may not feel as obligated to respond to your outreach. Make it clear in your first contact exactly what your purpose is and what the time commitment will be for whatever you’re asking. A call and an email used together will yield the best results.
PROS
Executive contacts are high-level and typically strategic. These are the people you tap for the most important advocate activities. Don’t squander them on low-level needs. Things can happen quickly due to the direct, high-level connection, and their authority to approve activities is the highest.
CONS
Your executives may be hesitant to make requests on your behalf. They generally save these advocates for their top priorities (co-speaking opportunities at conferences, earnings reports, investor meetings, etc.). Be sure to have clear objectives/plans for these MVPs to gain your executives’ confidence.
PROS
These are pre-qualified advocates. They have a track record and have already gone through internal approval processes. They know what’s necessary. That means it should be quicker to gain their participation for additional, different advocate activities.
CONS
The number of advocate customers from this source may not be high, but the quality will be there.
PROS
Advocates may be found that would otherwise have gone undetected. Helpful for scaling discovery efforts.
CONS
The number of advocate customers found using this method may not be high. Additional quality control steps are needed to verify that AI’s findings are accurate, before initiating any outreach to the customer. These extra steps may not be the most efficient using emerging AI technology.
There’s no single “right” way to find customer advocates. The best programs use a mix of methods—tailored to their culture, resources, and goals.
But whatever you do, do it now. Don’t wait until the next urgent request exposes another gap. A well-stocked, well-aligned advocate pool is one of the most powerful assets your company has.
Every day without it is a day your company is at a competitive disadvantage.